University of Pittsburgh, Spring 2005 (05-2)
David J. Birnbaum (djbpitt+medieval@pitt.edu)
Nancy Condee (condee+@pitt.edu)
Location: http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/~djb/medieval_literature/05-2/paper_guidelines.html
Main Course Page: http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/~djb/medieval_literature/05-2/
The research project in this course has four basic stages: bibliography, first version, seminar discussion, and final version. All deadlines are firm; please do not ask for extensions.
Browse through the Zenkovsky anthology (or something equivalent) and a history of the literature of medieval Rus′ and select a topic for your research as soon as possible. You are responsible for selecting your own topic, but you should consult with the instructor about your selection, primarily to ensure that it is not too ambitious or comprehensive for a one-semester project. Your research paper topic must be different from your oral presentation topics and no two students may select the same research topic (first come, first served). Topics must be approved by Tuesday, 01-20 so that you will have enough time to prepare the bibliographic assignment outlined below and to order any materials you may need from interlibrary loan.
A comprehensive bibliography on your research topic is due by the beginning of our regular class meeting on Thursday, 03-03. Bibliographies should adhere to a coherent and standard system for structure and transliteration; either follow a standard style sheet (such as the MLA or Chicago guides) or imitate the style used in a responsible Slavistic journal of your choice.
Bibliographies should be as comprehensive as is practical, incorporating all relevant materials in all Slavic and western European languages (including those you do not read yourself; see your instructors for advice if this situation arises). This means that you need to select a topic that can be researched adequately in one semester.
Begin by searching serial bibliographies, as well as on-line library catalogues (not just at Pitt; if you haven’t done this before, library assistants can provide technical advice). We often rely on the Harvard collection (connect to http://lib.harvard.edu/ and click on “Hollis catalog”), but any major Slavic collection will do. Start your bibliographic work early, so that you can make interlibrary loan requests as soon as possible (ideally, no later than the end of January); like professional Slavistic scholars, you will need to use interlibrary loan to examine those major works related to your topic that are not in the Pitt collection. Please don’t discover only in the middle of March, when the first version of your paper is due, that the Pitt libraries lack a publication that is crucial to your research.
Your richest bibliographic results will usually come from “running” the bibliographies of publications that deal with your topic. This involves finding a few useful works, adding the bibliographic citations you find in these works to your own master bibliography, and then following the trail by repeating the process. When you repeatedly come up with no new useful works, you have probably found everything, at which point you should stop. Include only sources that seem like they will be useful for further research; you do not need to find every work that mentions your topic in passing, but you should find every one that deals with it seriously. The most promising sources for bibliography in this area are usually recent scholarly editions of texts (although Russian publications are still notorious for neglecting non-Russian scholarship).
Keep a bibliographic log outlining your research path (which works you consulted, how you found them, when you placed your interlibrary loan orders, etc.), which you must submit with your bibliography. The purpose of the log is twofold: it helps you remember what you have already examined, so that you don't repeat your steps, and it lets your instructors see where you may have gone wrong if it turns out that you missed something significant. Do not waste excessive time on formatting your log or documenting every step you take; although it is required, the log is not as much a formal part of your assignment as it is a research aid for you and a diagnostic aid for your instructors. Keep it up to date as you work; this is easier than reconstructing it later.
If you come across a source that may be useful to a fellow student in the course, please feel free to pass it along. But because one goal of this project is to gain experience in conducting primary research, please do not ask for assistance with your project from graduate colleagues who have taken this course previously.
The first version of your research paper is due at the beginning of class on Tuesday, 03-22. Bring enough copies to class for everyone; we will distribute them there. Collect the cost of photocopying your paper from everyone (including instructors).
Your first version should be a polished, finished paper, which you would not be ashamed to submit for professional evaluation (for a grade, for presentation at a conference, for publication, etc.). This is not a rough draft, and you should not leave holes in the paper that you intend to fill in when you write the final version. Rather, you should regard the mid-March version as a finished product. Papers may be in English or Russian.
Read your classmates’ papers between Tuesday, 03-22 and Wednesday, 04-04 and prepare written comments (see below). We will devote the meetings of Tuesday, 04-05, Thursday, 04-07, and Tuesday, 04-12 to discussion of these papers.
These discussions are the focal point of the research paper. You should imagine yourselves as journal referees who are responsible for advising an editor on whether a paper should be accepted as is, accepted with revisions, or rejected as unsuitable for publication. While students are used to writing papers for teachers, and teachers are used to reading students’ papers, scholars evaluate and critique one another’s work in a very different way, and the purpose of this discussion is to give you the opportunity to participate in that type of scholarly activity.
Prepare for these discussions by reading the papers, marking them up, and writing up any comments to the author that cannot be written legibly on the margins of the paper itself. You should also prepare the sort of brief written report (one page or less is usually sufficient, unless there are a lot of problems with the submission) that you would provide to a journal editor about the article under review, recommending publication, revision, or rejection and substantiating your recommendation.
Final versions of your papers, revised in response to referee reports, are due at the beginning of the last course meeting, 04-28. Papers will be evaluated according to the quality of the bibliography, first version (note that this should be a polished paper, and not a rough draft), and final version. Your evaluation of your classmates' papers will be part of your grade for class participation.